Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
每年南極夏季期間，約有5,000名人員在約30個國家運作的80個研究站工作。。51吃瓜对此有专业解读
，这一点在WPS下载最新地址中也有详细论述
Follow topics & set alerts with myFT，详情可参考夫子
昨晚，OpenAI 终于宣布完成 1100 亿美元新一轮融资，投前估值高达 7300 亿美元。